Herrero, M. et al. Innovation can accelerate the transition towards a sustainable food system. Nat. Food 1, 266–272 (2020).
Galanakis, C., Rizou, M., Aldawoud, T. M., Ucak, I. & Rowan, N. Innovations and technology disruptions in the food sector within the COVID-19 pandemic and post-lockdown era. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 110, 193–200 (2021).
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2015).
Kroll, C., Warchold, A. & Pradhan, P. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies? Palgrave Commun. 5, 140 (2019).
Herrero, M. et al. Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e50–e62 (2021).
Béné, C. et al. Global map and indicators of food system sustainability. Sci. Data 6, 279 (2019).
Chaudhary, A., Gustafson, D. & Mathys, A. Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nat. Commun. 9, 848 (2018).
Hebinck, A. et al. A sustainability compass for policy navigation to sustainable food systems. Glob. Food Sec. 29, 100546 (2021).
Saget, S. et al. Substitution of beef with pea protein reduces the environmental footprint of meat balls whilst supporting health and climate stabilisation goals. J. Clean. Prod. 297, 126447 (2021).
Saget, S. et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of plant and beef-based patties, including carbon opportunity costs. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 28, 936–952 (2021).
Röös, E., Patel, M. & Spångberg, J. Producing oat drink or cow’s milk on a Swedish farm—environmental impacts considering the service of grazing, the opportunity cost of land and the demand for beef and protein. Agric. Syst. 142, 23–32 (2016).
Wang, X. et al. Health risks of population exposure to phthalic acid esters through the use of plastic containers for takeaway food in China. Sci. Total Environ. 785, 147347 (2021).
Li, C., Mirosa, M. & Bremer, P. Review of online food delivery platforms and their impacts on sustainability. Sustainability 12, 5528 (2020).
Rejeb, A. & Rejeb, K. Blockchain and supply chain sustainability. Logforum 16, 363–372 (2020).
Ali, M., Chung, L., Kumar, A., Zailani, S. & Tan, K. A sustainable blockchain framework for the halal food supply chain: lessons from Malaysia. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 170, 120870 (2021).
Mangla, S. K. et al. Using system dynamics to analyze the societal impacts of blockchain technology in milk supply chainsrefer. Transp. Res. E 149, 102289 (2021).
Katsikouli, P., Wilde, A., Dragoni, N. & Hogh-Jensen, H. On the benefits and challenges of blockchains for managing food supply chains. J. Sci. Food Agric. 101, 2175–2181 (2021).
Rogerson, M. & Parry, G. Blockchain: case studies in food supply chain visibility. Supply Chain Manag. J. 25, 601–614 (2020).
Park, A. & Li, H. The effect of blockchain technology on supply chain sustainability performances. Sustainability 13, 1726 (2021).
Feng, H., Wang, X., Duan, Y., Zhang, J. & Zhang, X. Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: a review of development methods, benefits and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 260, 121031 (2020).
Rejeb, A. Blockchain potential in tilapia supply chain in Ghana. Acta Tech. Jaurinensis 11, 104–118 (2018).
Tsolakis, N., Niedenzu, D., Simonetto, M., Dora, M. & Kumar, M. Supply network design to address United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: a case study of blockchain implementation in Thai fish industry. J. Bus. Res. 131, 495–519 (2021).
Rana, R. L., Tricase, C. & De Cesare, L. Blockchain technology for a sustainable agri-food supply chain. Br. Food J. 123, 3471–3485 (2021).
Karlsson Potter, H. & Röös, E. Multi-criteria evaluation of plant-based foods—use of environmental footprint and LCA data for consumer guidance. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124721 (2021).
Liao, X. et al. Large-scale regionalised LCA shows that plant-based fat spreads have a lower climate, land occupation and water scarcity impact than dairy butter. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25, 1043–1058 (2020).
McClements, D. & Grossmann, L. The science of plant-based foods: constructing next-generation meat, fish, milk, and egg analogs. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20, 4049–4100 (2021).
Santo, R. E. et al. Considering plant-based meat substitutes and cell-based meats: a public health and food systems perspective. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 134 (2020).
Grant, C. A. & Hicks, A. L. Comparative life cycle assessment of milk and plant-based alternatives. Environ. Eng. Sci. 35, 1235–1247 (2018).
Saerens, W., Smetana, S., Van Campenhout, L., Lammers, V. & Heinz, V. Life cycle assessment of burger patties produced with extruded meat substitutes. J. Clean. Prod. 306, 127177 (2021).
Smetana, S., Profeta, A., Voigt, R., Kircher, C. & Heinz, V. Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and life cycle assessment. Future Foods 4, 100042 (2021).
Detzel, A. et al. Life cycle assessment of animal-based foods and plant-based protein-rich alternatives: an environmental perspective. J. Sci. Food Agric. 102, 5098–5110 (2022).
Fresán, U. & Rippin, H. Nutritional quality of plant-based cheese available in Spanish supermarkets: how do they compare to dairy cheese? Nutrients 13, 3291 (2021).
Curtain, F. & Grafenauer, S. Plant-based meat substitutes in the flexitarian age: an audit of products on supermarket shelves. Nutrients 11, 2603 (2019).
Fresan, U., Mejia, M., Craig, W., Jaceldo-Siegl, K. & Sabate, J. Meat analogs from different protein sources: a comparison of their sustainability and nutritional content. Sustainability 11, 3231 (2019).
Neville, M., Tarrega, A., Hewson, L. & Foster, T. Consumer-orientated development of hybrid beef burger and sausage analogues. Food Sci. Nutr. 5, 852–864 (2017).
Elzerman, J., Keulemans, L., Sap, R. & Luning, P. Situational appropriateness of meat products, meat substitutes and meat alternatives as perceived by Dutch consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 88, 104108 (2021).
Beckerman, J., Blondin, S., Richardson, S. & Rimm, E. Environmental and economic effects of changing to shelf-stable dairy or soy milk for the breakfast in the classroom program. Am. J. Public Health 109, 736–738 (2019).
Schuster, M. J., Wang, X., Hawkins, T. & Painter, J. E. Comparison of the nutrient content of cow’s milk and nondairy milk alternatives: what’s the difference? Nutr. Today 53, 153–159 (2018).
Romeo, D., Vea, E. B. & Thomsen, M. Environmental impacts of urban hydroponics in Europe: a case study in Lyon. Procedia CIRP 69, 540–545 (2018).
Orsini, F., Pennisi, G., Zulfiqar, F. & Gianquinto, G. Sustainable use of resources in plant factories with artificial lighting (PFALs). Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 85, 297–309 (2020).
Kikuchi, Y., Kanematsu, Y., Yoshikawa, N., Okubo, T. & Takagaki, M. Environmental and resource use analysis of plant factories with energy technology options: a case study in Japan. J. Clean. Prod. 186, 703–717 (2018).
Boyer, D. & Ramaswami, A. What is the contribution of city-scale actions to the overall food system’s environmental impacts? Assessing water, greenhouse gas, and land impacts of future urban food scenarios. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 12035–12045 (2017).
Avgoustaki, D. & Xydis, G. Indoor vertical farming in the urban nexus context: business growth and resource savings. Sustainability 12, 1965 (2020).
Graamans, L., Baeza, E., van den Dobbelsteen, A., Tsafaras, I. & Stanghellini, C. Plant factories versus greenhouses: comparison of resource use efficiency. Agric. Syst. 160, 31–43 (2018).
Sanjuan-Delmas, D. et al. Environmental assessment of an integrated rooftop greenhouse for food production in cities. J. Clean. Prod. 177, 326–337 (2018).
Martin, M. & Molin, E. Environmental assessment of an urban vertical hydroponic farming system in Sweden. Sustainability 11, 4124 (2019).
Eaves, J. & Eaves, S. Comparing the profitability of a greenhouse to a vertical farm in Quebec. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 66, 43–54 (2018).
Hardi, L. & Wagner, U. Grocery delivery or customer pickup-influences on energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Munich. Sustainability 11, 641 (2019).
Allen, J. et al. Understanding the transport and CO2 impacts of on-demand meal deliveries: a London case study. Cities 108, 102973 (2021).
Xie, J., Xu, Y. & Li, H. Environmental impact of express food delivery in China: the role of personal consumption choice. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 8234–8251 (2021).
Arunan, I. & Crawford, R. Greenhouse gas emissions associated with food packaging for online food delivery services in Australia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168, 105299 (2021).
Springmann, M., Clark, M. A., Rayner, M., Scarborough, P. & Webb, P. The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e797–e807 (2021).
Desiderio, E., García-Herrero, L., Hall, D., Segrè, A. & Vittuari, M. Social sustainability tools and indicators for the food supply chain: a systematic literature review. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 30, 527–540 (2022).
Afshin, A. et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 393, 1958–1972 (2019).
Martin, C., Lange, C. & Marette, S. Importance of additional information, as a complement to information coming from packaging, to promote meat substitutes: a case study on a sausage based on vegetable proteins. Food Qual. Prefer. 87, 104058 (2021).
Alternative Seafood. State of the Industry Report (Good Food Institute, 2021); https://gfi.org/resource/alternative-seafood-state-of-the-industry-report/
Gephart, J. A. et al. Environmental performance of blue foods. Nature 597, 360–365 (2021).
Golden, C. D. et al. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature 598, 315–320 (2021).
Kalantari, F., Tahir, O. M., Joni, R. A. & Fatemi, E. Opportunities and challenges in sustainability of vertical farming: a review. J. Landsc. Ecol. 11, 35–60 (2018).
van Delden, S. H. et al. Current status and future challenges in implementing and upscaling vertical farming systems. Nat. Food 2, 944–956 (2021).
Weidner, T., Yang, A., Forster, F. & Hamm, M. W. Regional conditions shape the food–energy–land nexus of low-carbon indoor farming. Nat. Food 3, 206–216 (2022).
World Health Organization Slide to Order: A Food Systems Approach to Meal Delivery Apps (WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, 2021); https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/350121
Pennisi, G. et al. Resource use efficiency of indoor lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivation as affected by red:blue ratio provided by LED lighting. Sci. Rep. 9, 14127 (2019).
Bryant, C., Szejda, K., Parekh, N., Deshpande, V. & Tse, B. A survey of consumer perceptions of plant-based and clean meat in the USA, India, and China. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3, 11 (2019).
Henriksson, P. J. G. et al. A rapid review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of environmental footprints of food commodities and diets. Glob. Food Sec. 28, 100508 (2021).
Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473 (2018).
Arksey, H. & O’Malley, L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 19–32 (2005).
Kohl, C. et al. Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools. Environ. Evid. 7, 8 (2018).
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B. & Rockström, J. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol. Soc. 21, 41 (2016).