• Bryan, A. F., Levine, D. M. & Tsai, T. C. Home hospital for surgery. JAMA Surg. 156, 679–680 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leff, B. et al. Hospital at home: feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 143, 798–808 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Safavi, K. C. et al. A different kind of perioperative surgical home: hospital at home after surgery. Ann. Surg. 271, 227–229 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • HealthIT.gov. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). Telemedicine and telehealth. https://www.healthit.gov/topic/health-it-health-care-settings/telemedicine-and-telehealth#:~:text=Remote%20patient%20monitoring%20(RPM)%3A,usually%20at%20a%20different%20time (2020).

  • Conley, J., Snyder, G. D., Whitehead, D. & Levine, D. M. Technology-enabled Hospital at Home: Innovation for Acute Care at Home. NEJM Catal 3 (2022).

  • Peyroteo, M., Ferreira, I. A., Elvas, L. B., Ferreira, J. C. & Lapão, L. V. Remote monitoring systems for patients with chronic diseases in primary health care: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 9, e28285 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coffey, J. D. et al. Implementation of a multisite, interdisciplinary remote patient monitoring program for ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19. NPJ Digit. Med. 4, 1–11 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huynh, D. N. et al. Description and early results of the Kaiser permanente Southern California COVID-19 home monitoring program. Perm. J. 25, 20.281 (2021).

  • Atilgan, K. et al. Remote patient monitoring after cardiac surgery: the utility of a novel telemedicine system. J. Card. Surg. 36, 4226–4234 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Farias, F. A. C., Dagostini, C. M., Bicca, Y. A., Falavigna, V. F. & Falavigna, A. Remote patient monitoring: a systematic review. Telemed. J. E. Health 26, 576–583 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Home. Biofourmis. Available at: https://biofourmis.com/ (2023) (Accessed: 5th February 2023).

  • Haque, A., Milstein, A. & Fei-Fei, L. Illuminating the dark spaces of healthcare with ambient intelligence. Nature 585, 193–202 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jorge, J. et al. Non-contact physiological monitoring of post-operative patients in the intensive care unit. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 1–11 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • VandeWeerd, C. et al. HomeSense: design of an ambient home health and wellness monitoring platform for older adults. Health Technol. 10, 1291–1309 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pol, M. C., ter Riet, G., van Hartingsveldt, M., Kröse, B. & Buurman, B. M. Effectiveness of sensor monitoring in a rehabilitation programme for older patients after hip fracture: a three-arm stepped wedge randomised trial. Age Ageing 48, 650–657 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kabelac, Z. et al. An in-home study of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) patients using contactless wireless sensing and machine learning (1561). Neurology 94 (2020).

  • Kim, K. M., Yefimova, M., Lin, F. V., Jopling, J. K. & Hansen, E. N. A home-recovery surgical care model using AI-driven measures of activities of daily living. NEJM Catal. Innov. Care. Deliv. 3 (2022).

  • Paine, C. W. et al. Systematic review of physiologic monitor alarm characteristics and pragmatic interventions to reduce alarm frequency. J. Hosp. Med. 11, 136–144 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sagahyroon, A. Remote patients monitoring: challenges. In 2017 IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) 1–4 (IEEE, 2017).

  • Vioptix. Tissue perfusion. https://www.vioptix.com/ (2023).

  • Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G. & Moons, K. G. M. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMC Med. 13, 1 (2015).

  • Neilley, V. What health care must learn from meteorology about the importance of R2O. https://www.statnews.com/2022/03/31/what-health-care-must-learn-from-meteorology-about-the-importance-of-r2o/ (2022).

  • Marwaha, J. S. & Kvedar, J. C. Crossing the chasm from model performance to clinical impact: the need to improve implementation and evaluation of AI. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 1–2 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bhandare, M., Thomas, M. & Joshi, R. Complications after supramajor gastrointestinal surgery: role of enhanced recovery after surgery. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 24, S205–S210 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stephenson, C. et al. Management of Common Postoperative Complications. Mayo Clin. Proc. 95, 2540–2554 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wj, Y. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3, 32–35 (1950).

  • Jung, K. et al. A framework for making predictive models useful in practice. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 28, 1149–1158 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Safavi, K. C. et al. Hospital at home for surgical patients: a case series from a pioneer program at a large academic medical center. Ann. Surg. 275, e275–e277 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schroeder, C. Pilot study of telemedicine for the initial evaluation of general surgery patients in the clinic and hospitalized settings. Surg. Open Sci. 1, 97–99 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Myers, D. R., Weiss, A., Rollins, M. R. & Lam, W. A. Towards remote assessment and screening of acute abdominal pain using only a smartphone with native accelerometers. Sci. Rep. 7, 12750 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haskel, O., Itelman, E., Zilber, E., Barkai, G. & Segal, G. Remote auscultation of heart and lungs as an acceptable alternative to legacy measures in quarantined COVID-19 patients—Prospective evaluation of 250 examinations. Sensors 22, 3165 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gowda, V., Schulzrinne, H. & Miller, B. J. The case for medical device interoperability. JAMA Health Forum 3, e214313–e214313 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, J. An upcoming milestone in our interoperability journey. Health IT Buzz https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/healthit-certification/an-upcoming-milestone-in-our-interoperability-journey (2022).

  • Administration, F&D. Design considerations and premarket submission recommendations for interoperable medical devices. (2017).

  • Haider, A. H. et al. Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 216, 482–492e12 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • ATA. A framework for eliminating health disparities using telehealth. https://www.americantelemed.org/resources/a-framework-for-eliminating-health-disparities-using-telehealth/ (2021).

  • Siu, A. L. et al. Health equity in hospital at home: outcomes for economically disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 70, 2153–2156 (2022).

  • Veinot, T. C., Mitchell, H. & Ancker, J. S. Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 25, 1080–1088 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Verma, S. Early impact of CMS expansion of medicare telehealth during COVID-19. Health Affairs (15 July 2020).

  • Hirsch, Q. Beyond broadband: equity, access, and the benefits of audio-only telehealth. Health Affairs (20 September 2021).

  • Holko, M. et al. Wearable fitness tracker use in federally qualified health center patients: strategies to improve the health of all of us using digital health devices. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 1–6 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • link

    By admin

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *